Introduction

Over the last 20 years, we have consistently seen that what many accept as a security risk assessment rarely reflects the true nature of risk. This article challenges those conventional approaches and brings clarity to how security should be understood and assessed. At Alwinco, we focus on identifying real risks without bias, free from influence, and grounded in practical experience. By addressing common misconceptions such as the misuse of risk matrices and the lack of independence in assessments, this article provides a clear and honest perspective on what an effective security risk assessment should deliver and why accurate risk identification remains the foundation of meaningful crime prevention.

We recently conducted an independent security risk assessment for a private residence in Stellenbosch.

Identifying risks that standard assessments often overlook. This approach allows practical measures to be recommended, enhancing the overall safety and security of the property.

If you would like to learn more about our assessments or have specific topics you would like us to address, please email your suggestions to andre@alwinco.co.za. We will create and publish articles tailored to your interests on our website.

Over the last 20 years,

I have read hundreds, if not thousands, of ‘so-called’ Security Risk Assessment that were done by various people, such as Security Managers, Security companies, Risk Managers and so on. The truth is that I have not found a single assessment that is even remotely close to right. Much crucial information is missing, and most conducting these assessments lack crime scene or security experience.

The Risk Matrix is wrong

This becomes a problem when they must identify the risks. Most risk managers make use of the risk matrix system to ‘grade’ the risk, which is impossible to do, as a risk is a risk. Whether the risk is great or small, it remains a risk. Risk creates the opportunity for crime to happen.

A Risk Matrix applies to Health and Safety, not to crime and security risk assessment.

I can make this statement because I have firsthand experience with incorrect risk assessments.

Independent

A true risk assessor only focuses on identifying the risks. He does not sell or install security hardware, nor is he part of the ‘solution’ in any way.

He also doesn’t form part of the management team that is responsible for the rollout of the solutions. He is a consultant. He is there to identify the risks, provide solid solutions for the identified risks, and provide guidance where needed.

I have yet to find a Risk Manager who has assessed the management component of the security portfolio.

I have never encountered a Risk Manager who has told the Management team or Board of Directors that they contribute to the problem. Security and Management go hand in hand, and when security is not right, you can just look at the management structure and find the risk. This is not an easy thing to say to your management team, especially if they pay your salary.

This statement is also true for homeowners assessing their security and for the Board of Directors at Estates. Read more on security and estates. 

Written by André Mundell, Independent Security Risk Consultant at Alwinco. # Security Risk Assessment Lodges 

Should you wish to learn more on our services offered or want more information on security risk assessments, please send us an email or kindly visit our website security meetings and subscribe to our Newsletter.

We offer our security risk assessment services in Universitas, Pinetown, Claremont, Arcadia, Parktown, and Midrand, along with other major cities.

Security Discussion with Your Partner